Which statement about the process to change the California Code of Regulations is EXCEPT?

The statement regarding the Emergency Rulemaking Process and Regular Rulemaking Process having the same standards and procedures is correct because these two processes serve different purposes and have distinct standards. The Emergency Rulemaking Process allows an agency to adopt regulations quickly in response to an urgent situation, typically bypassing some of the usual procedural requirements, including the extended public comment periods required in the Regular Rulemaking Process. In contrast, the Regular Rulemaking Process typically involves comprehensive steps, including a minimum public comment period of 45 days, which allows for thorough stakeholder engagement. This distinction highlights the necessity for different approaches depending on the urgency and nature of the regulatory change.